James Cowles Prichard
Ethnographic Map of Europe, 1861
20 x 25 in
51 x 63 cm
51 x 63 cm
EUR1576
Copyright The Artist
Fascinating map of Europe showing the distribution of indigenous ethnic groups. The map divides the continent into 29 regions, each corresponding to the main ethnic group found there. These regions...
Fascinating map of Europe showing the distribution of indigenous ethnic groups.
The map divides the continent into 29 regions, each corresponding to the main ethnic group found there. These regions are colour-coded and referenced in the legend along the right-hand margin. Topographical detail is minimal, showing only principal mountains, bodies of water, and coastal features. The map extends from Iberia in the west to the Caspian Sea in the east, and from Scandinavia to Crete, north to south.
This map is based on the research of James Cowles Prichard, FRS (1786–1848) a British physician and ethnologist regarded as a foundational figure in early anthropology. Pritchard’s work on which this map is based, “The Natural History of Man” (1843), promoted a then radical belief in monogenism: the belief that all humans share a single common origin, descending from the same ancestral source. Writing in a pre-Darwinian era, Prichard’s research prefigured later evolutionary thought. He was an early member of the Aborigines’ Protection Society and advocated humanitarian treatment of Indigenous peoples.
As is typical of 19th-century ethnographica, Prichard’s map reveals the cultural biases of its time. The drive for racialisation reflects colonial agendas, the classifications of which were influenced by the period’s scientific racism, limited progress in the study of biology, and dependence on secondary sources. Prichard’s delineations rely on superficial factors like physical appearance and geography, whereas modern anthropology classifies Indigenous peoples through linguistic, cultural, and material evidence—approaches that yield greater accuracy and respect for Indigenous self-identification.
Nevertheless, Prichard’s belief in human unity and his advocacy for Indigenous rights set him apart from many of his contemporaries, making this map a fascinating record of progressive anthropological belief in the earliest days of the discipline.
Original hand colour.
The map divides the continent into 29 regions, each corresponding to the main ethnic group found there. These regions are colour-coded and referenced in the legend along the right-hand margin. Topographical detail is minimal, showing only principal mountains, bodies of water, and coastal features. The map extends from Iberia in the west to the Caspian Sea in the east, and from Scandinavia to Crete, north to south.
This map is based on the research of James Cowles Prichard, FRS (1786–1848) a British physician and ethnologist regarded as a foundational figure in early anthropology. Pritchard’s work on which this map is based, “The Natural History of Man” (1843), promoted a then radical belief in monogenism: the belief that all humans share a single common origin, descending from the same ancestral source. Writing in a pre-Darwinian era, Prichard’s research prefigured later evolutionary thought. He was an early member of the Aborigines’ Protection Society and advocated humanitarian treatment of Indigenous peoples.
As is typical of 19th-century ethnographica, Prichard’s map reveals the cultural biases of its time. The drive for racialisation reflects colonial agendas, the classifications of which were influenced by the period’s scientific racism, limited progress in the study of biology, and dependence on secondary sources. Prichard’s delineations rely on superficial factors like physical appearance and geography, whereas modern anthropology classifies Indigenous peoples through linguistic, cultural, and material evidence—approaches that yield greater accuracy and respect for Indigenous self-identification.
Nevertheless, Prichard’s belief in human unity and his advocacy for Indigenous rights set him apart from many of his contemporaries, making this map a fascinating record of progressive anthropological belief in the earliest days of the discipline.
Original hand colour.
